Daniel Convissor's Website
Now for the math.
Either way you look at it, bikes are more efficient. Now, factor in that both the cyclist and auto driver are going to eat about 2,000 kcal anyway. To go a mile, I'd only have to eat between 2% and 7% more food, if I eat anymore at all.
WORST CASE SCENARIO [using 10 times figure and 25% energy conversion]: 35 kcal/mi ---------- = 140 kcal's of food need to be eaten to bike one mile .25 140 kcal/mi * 10 = 1,400 kcal to grow food to bike 1 mi. 1,860 kcal/mi 1 - ------------- = .25 = Bikes are 25% more efficient 1,400 kcal/mi
BEST CASE SCENARIO: 140 kcal/mi * 5 = 700 kcal to grow food to bike 1 mi. 700 kcal/mi 1 - ------------- = .62 = Bikes are 62% more efficient. 1,860 kcal/mi
This page is hosted by Daniel Convissor
Home Page: http://www.panix.com/~danielc/
Email: danielc@panix.com
This URL: http://www.panix.com/~danielc/world/carvbike.htm
Last updated: 7 April 1999