ISSN 1534-0236
Technology and ideology alike are exercises in applied imagination.
Another victory: the Czech Republic is giving legal recognition to same-sex partnerships. The Czech Parliament overrode a presidential veto on this one--the president had called the law excessive regulation by the state of people's private lives, which is nonsense, but suggests that he didn't think he could say, outright, that he was opposed to people forming families, raising children together, and inheriting property from their partners. (The bill doesn't allow for adoption, but if I read the BBC story right, does recognize a right to keep custody of one's children.)
I am not terribly surprised that the Netherlands and Canada are ahead of the U.S. on this--but it's odd looking to South Africa and the Czech Republic as good examples in such matters. Not that I begrudge the Czechs, or anyone--I just wish the United States would join them in doing the right thing.
The comet samples brought back by the Stardust mission contain unexpected materials that form only at high temperatures:
They appear to be abundant [in Comet Wild-2], having been found in about one in four of the particles examined so far.The researchers are speculating on whether the materials themselves formed near the Sun and were transported out to the comet-forming regions, or were created near other stars and available in the early solar nebula.One of these minerals known as forsterite, which melts at 2,000C and condenses at 1,127C, has been detected in a comet before.
But other minerals found in the Stardust samples resemble so-called calcium-aluminium inclusions (CAIs), which form at even higher temperatures.
Enceladus may have liquid water within a hundred meters of the surface.
High-resolution Cassini images show icy jets and towering plumes ejecting large quantities of particles at high speed. Scientists examined several models to explain the process. They ruled out the idea that the particles are produced by or blown off the moon's surface by vapor created when warm water ice converts to a gas. Instead, scientists have found evidence for a much more exciting possibility -- the jets might be erupting from near-surface pockets of liquid water above 0 degrees Celsius (32 degrees Fahrenheit), like cold versions of the Old Faithful geyser in Yellowstone.[via James Nicoll]
Sandia National Lab has set a new record temperature--two billion Kelvin--in the lab. The interesting part is that they aren't sure what's going on, or why the reaction is producing an energy surplus. It is repeatable--they've been doing this for fourteen months--but the physics behind it hasn't been identified.
Second, and more unusually, high ion temperatures were sustained after the plasma had stagnated — that is, after its ions had presumably lost motion and therefore energy and therefore heat — as though yet again some unknown agent was providing an additional energy source to the ions.Sandia’s Z machine normally works like this: 20 million amps of electricity pass through a small core of vertical tungsten wires finer than human hairs. The core is about the size of a spool of thread. The wires dissolve instantly into a cloud of charged particles called a plasma.
The plasma, caught in the grip of the very strong magnetic field accompanying the electrical current, is compressed to the thickness of a pencil lead. This happens very rapidly, at a velocity that would fly a plane from New York to San Francisco in several seconds.
At that point, the ions and electrons have nowhere further to go. Like a speeding car hitting a brick wall, they stop suddenly, releasing energy in the form of X-rays that reach temperatures of several million degrees — the temperature of solar flares.
The new achievement — temperatures of billions of degrees — was obtained in part by substituting steel wires in cylindrical arrays 55 mm to 80 mm in diameter for the more typical tungsten wire arrays, approximately only 20 mm in diameter. The higher velocities achieved over these longer distances were part of the reason for the higher temperatures.…
Haines theorized that the rapid conversion of magnetic energy to a very high ion plasma temperature was achieved by unexpected instabilities at the point of ordinary stagnation: that is, the point at which ions and electrons should have been unable to travel further. The plasma should have collapsed, its internal energy radiated away. But for approximately 10 nanoseconds, some unknown energy was still pushing back against the magnetic field.
Ken MacLeod has posted his Boskone Guest of Honor talk to his Weblog, with the heading "where I get my other ideas": some of the roots of his thinking and writing. He starts off by saying that he's tired of talking about Trotskyism, libertarianism, and cyberpunk, so instead he's going to talk about landscape, religion, philosophy, and real science and technology.
Roz Kaveney has posted some excellent thoughts on secular liberal humanism, its virtues, and how it differs from religion. She's reacting in part to claims that free speech advocates are inherently absolutist.
At its best, secular liberal humanism is profoundly aware of the depth of human ignorance and thus unprepared to move to options that close off further argument, whereas much religious belief is a total system in which everything is already known and has only to be interpreted in practical terms. If it is known that there is a god, and that there are souls which are eternal, and that the mind of god in respect of the fate of those souls is already laid down in a book, then it is possible to lay out your duty clearly whatever the consequence for short-lived human bodies....One of the things that perpetually amazes me about believers is how much more tolerant they are of such sins as spiritual pride and downright hatred than they are of minor sexual offenses. I don't believe in the inerrancy of scripture, but I am constantly amazed how most fundamentalist Christians neglect the simple spiritual wisdom contained in the gospel accounts of the parable of the Pharisee and the Publican.)
Which leads me to one of the bottom lines of this discussion. Precisely what can I, as an agnostic, and a secular liberal humanist, say about religion that some believers somewhere are not going to find g rossly offensive? When I talk about the prophets, I may manage to refrain from personal abuse of them, and may bend over backwards to acknowledge the good faith in which they spoke, but, when it comes to the question of whether they had the direct and privileged access that they claimed to the mind of the god in whom I do not, as such, believe, I am obliged to say that I think they were mistaken. Not mad, not lying, just wrong.
The discussion there is also interesting, though it includes the inevitable person missing the point and insisting that atheism is a religion.
British Columbia has announced an agreement to save the Great Bear Rainforest, a temperate rainforest on the mainland Pacific Coast that houses the Kermode bear--a white-furred subspecies of black bear--as well as wolves, grizzlies, and salmon. About a third of the 25,000-square-mile (64,000 square-km) region will be a wildlife preserve; the rest will be used for logging and mining that environmental groups consider sustainable. The First Nations of the area support the agreement as well.
Researchers at the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge, have put some numbers on the distribution and properties of dark matter.
The results, based on careful measurements of star movement in 12 nearby dwarf galaxies, are startling: rather than being cold, these particles are moving at a velocity that equals a temperature of about 10,000 degrees:
"It comes in a 'magic volume' which happens to correspond to an amount which is 30 million times the mass of the Sun."It looks like you cannot ever pack it smaller than about 300 parsecs - 1,000 light-years; this stuff will not let you. That tells you a speed actually - about 9km/s - at which the dark matter particles are moving because they are moving too fast to be compressed into a smaller scale.
The article doesn't mention last year's paper that challenged the dark matter hypothesis using relativistic measurements of galactic mass and velocity, but if I'm reading this right--and it's written accurately--the new measurements can't be explained as relativistic mass of "normal" baryonic matter. Clearly, if there is no dark matter it has no measurable properties. Conversely, these measurements suggest that there is a significant amount of dark matter, even if it doesn't account for all of the otherwise-unexplained movement and cohesion of galaxies.
More problems with the Medicare drug plan: since it's specifically a drug plan, not a medical plan, patients are being sent IV medication without the necessary supplies, such as IV tubing, and told that if they need help administering the drug, they have to go to the hospital. Until 1 January, Medicare, like private insurers, was paying for nurses to go to patients' homes for this purpose.
At-home IV has been common since the 1980s: ACT-UP pushed it through, but the insurers went along not just because patients prefer it and it's safer, but because it's a lot cheaper.
Republican Sens. Arlen Specter and Rick Santorum, both of Pennsylvania, wrote to the Medicare agency in October, saying it "has opted to define the coverage of home infusion therapy in a manner that does not include financial coverage for … professional services, supplies and equipment that are required for the safe and effective provision of therapy."Given how Congress often works these days, I wonder if those Senators--or any others--did read the act before voting it into law.In a response dated Dec. 27, Mark McClellan, administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said the agency lacked specific legal authority to broaden the coverage policy, in effect, handing the problem back to Congress.
"If we could pay for it, we would," said Dr. Jeff Kelman, chief medical officer for the division of Medicare that handles the drug benefit. "Read the act yourself …. It's a drug benefit, not a medical benefit."
Mark Morford reacts to the hate mail he got for praising Brokeback Mountain by talking about the real gay agenda:
This is, in fact, the most sinister gay agenda of all. Normalcy. Lack of fear. Happiness. The right to be miserably in love just like everyone else and have it recognized by the culture as, well, no big deal. Safe. Healthy. Beautiful, even. What nerve.
I suspect he's mostly preaching to the choir, though also perhaps to the people who read his column knowing that they will disagree with almost all of it, often angrily, the "Steve" and "Larry" whose letters prompted this, who don't have room to comprehend that when I'm IMing with my girlfriend late into the evening, I'm more likely discussing our mutual job worries than anything that would tell a third party that we are in fact lovers, or for that matter both women.
Today's NY Times magazine has an interesting article on the study of animal personality. Researchers are looking at consistent behavior and behavior patterns in octopuses, sticklebacks, fruit flies and numerous other species that are easy to study in the lab, and finding similarities to the behavior of species, including ourselves, that we're willing to use the word "personality" for. The author notes that even while behaviorists banished the concept of "personality" from discussions of animals--and of animals from psychology--most people, while we may doubt that a fruit fly can have a personality, have agreed that dogs, cats, and horses--animals we actually live near, and have bred to live near us--have distinct personalities.
Yes, I had a "well, duh" reaction at the beginning--of course this makes sense, we're a species of animal--but whether that idea strikes you as obvious or as weird and irrelevant, the author goes into details about the work now being done and published. He points out that one thing driving this is recent progress in genetics--researchers who are curious about how genes affect behavior can compare genes in sticklebacks or Drosophila to those in dogs and humans.
German scientists have found a previously overlooked source of methane: ordinary plants.
To their amazement, the scientists found that all the textbooks written on the biochemistry of plants had apparently overlooked the fact that methane is produced by a range of plants even when there is plenty of oxygen.This doesn't mean that Earth has more methane than we thought: it means that a significant amount of it comes from a different place--or places--than we'd previously realized. The world is a strange and wondrous place indeed.The amount of the gas produced increased when the air was warmer, and when there was more sunlight. The paper estimates that this unexplained phenomenon could account for between 10 and 30 per cent of the world's methane emissions.
What this means for global climate isn't yet clear. To go with the new lab results, there's a new report of otherwise-unexplained methane production in the Amazon, but more quantitative data are needed.
Copyright 2006 Vicki Rosenzweig. Comments welcome at vr@redbird.org.
If you like this, you might also like my home page or my online journal.