So, once again, after taking a bit of heat from Republicans, Barack Obama and His Evil Minions™ are looking to cave on a core value.
Only this time, it is not a core value of the Democratic party, but rather a core value which our nation was founded, the idea that the King’s power to simply imprison indefinitely on a whim is an anathema to a civilized society:
Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, will probably remain in military detention without trial for the foreseeable future, according to Obama administration officials.
The administration has concluded that it cannot put Mohammed on trial in federal court because of the opposition of lawmakers in Congress and in New York. There is also little internal support for resurrecting a military prosecution at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The latter option would alienate liberal supporters.
The administration asserts that it can hold Mohammed and other al-Qaeda operatives under the laws of war, a principle that has been upheld by the courts when Guantanamo Bay detainees have challenged their detention.
The White House has made it clear that President Obama will ultimately make the decision, and a federal prosecution of Mohammed and four alleged co-conspirators has not been ruled out, senior officials said. Still, they acknowledge that a trial is unlikely to happen before the next presidential election and, even then, would require a different political environment.
You see, even after they tried a child soldier using laws that were made up after the actions, and using evidence derived from torture, Republicans are still saying bad things about them, so now, they will now just stop trials altogether.
Due process is just too politically inconvenient.
There is a point where moral cowardice crosses a line, and becomes actively evil, and emulating the practices of the worst despots in history out of electoral consideration is way over that line.
You know, there is a way to hold people without trial — prisoner of war status.
This would mean you could still try people, for breaking the laws of war, but it would have to be a court martial system.
It would also mean you could hold people until the war ends…mildly problematic.
And (which is why they won't do it) US authorities would have to respect the command struture of the prisoners, allow them to organize themselve, etc.
Additinally, it makes the US liable for torture.