It turns out that Komen CEO Nancy Brinker has managed to generate 6 figures in reimbursable expenses from the charity while she was working full time for the Bush administration:

She billed her charity for $133,507 in expenses at a time when she had a full-time job elsewhere. Her staff is in turmoil. While her cancer-fighting work is undisputed, her managerial style is not.

Nancy Brinker, a socialite, powerbroker, and former U.S. ambassador to Hungary, has turned Susan G. Komen for the Cure into a cancer-fighting giant over the past three decades. Now, critics say, it may be time for her to go—if she wants to preserve the very charity she built.

The recent crisis over Komen’s decision to de-fund—and then re-fund—Planned Parenthood has put Brinker under intense scrutiny, with observers questioning everything from her management style to her earnings to her spending. “It has all become a diversion. It has itself become cancerous,” says Eve Ellis, a former board member of Komen in New York City. “Nancy has accomplished so much and provides so many millions in research dollars, but the foundation needs to get back to being strong. For that to happen, she needs to step down.”

In interviews with The Daily Beast, a half-dozen former Komen employees who held a range of jobs at the charity in the past five years expressed similar sentiments, saying the foundation has become dominated by its larger-than-life leader. These people strongly acknowledge Brinker’s accomplishments, praising her immense skill at raising funds for lifesaving cancer research. At the same time, they describe her as an imposing figure who flies first class, prefers five-star hotels, and generally exhibits an entitled air, which, they say, is at odds with the organization’s important mission. Employees don’t call her “Nancy,” these people say. They are expected to call her “Ambassador Brinker.”

In the 30 years since she launched the foundation, Brinker has raised some $1.9 billion for cancer research. More than 100,000 volunteers work in a nationwide network of affiliates. It was all Brinker’s vision—she started the charity after her sister, Susan G. Komen, died of breast cancer in her mid-30s.

………

The Daily Beast found that Brinker billed the foundation for $133,507 in expenses from June 2007 to January 2009, according to her filings with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics. At the time, she was a full-time federal employee, serving as chief of protocol for the State Department. President Bush nominated her for the position in June 2007 and she held the job until January 2009.

But it gets better:

After Brinker’s term in the State Department ended in 2009, she returned full time to Komen. Her return coincided with a cultural shift within the foundation, former employees say. She was more distant and aloof, these people say. “It was like suddenly she expected someone to carry her purse,” says one person.

…………

At the Komen foundation, management turned over fairly rapidly from 2009 to 2011, at considerable expense to the foundation.

It appears that her stint in the Bush administration may have knocked a screw loose, a not unsurprising development.

It is interesting to see the knives come out. Just as few weeks ago, Komen was synonymous with the fight against breast cancer, and now the dam has burst.

Komen may survive, but Nancy Brinker won’t be at the helm.  She’s done, even if she does not realize this yet.

As an aside, at the core of much of movement conservatism is a sense of entitlement, and a sense of entitlement is generally incompatible with a properly functioning charity.

This doesn’t mean that Republicans can’t do good charity work, it just means that their world view renders them more vulnerable to losing sight of their mission.