Because even if you get Democrats in Name Only into office, it turns out that it takes a lot more money to do so:

Writing for Stars and Stripes and the Washington Post Sunday, Anne Kim, an operative for Wall Street’s deceptively named Progressive Policy Institute (a pro-corporate/anti-worker New Dem outfit that was founded by the DLC to promote neoliberal ideas like NAFTA and the TPP), decries how much more it costs reactionary Democrats– New Dems and Blue Dogs– to run for election than it costs real Democrats. It costs the Democrats who support the Republican/Wall Street agenda double what it costs actual Democrats to run for office. Kim’s research finds that the fake Dems “spent roughly twice as much as their liberal counterparts to win or defend their seats.” That trend is getting more pronounced and she pointed out that for every dollar that the average Progressive Caucus member directly spent to defend his or her seat in 2014, the average right-wing Democrat spent $1.93. By comparison, right-wing Democrats shelled out $1.54 for every campaign dollar spent by liberals by 2012 and $1.65 in 2010.

She doesn’t get into it, but these figures include the way Wall Street-backed conservaDems gigantically outspend progressives in primaries, often with the help of the Democratic Beltway Establishment which has now entirely abandoned its pretense of being neutral in primaries. Let’s look at a few of the most recent examples from the last cycle. Here are 4 notable races that pitted New Dem types who back cutting Social Security benefits against progressives who favor expanding Social Security. In each case, the corporate-backed right-winger seriously outspent the progressive:

• CA-17- Ro Khanna- $4,427,701, Mike Honda- $3,447,979
• CA-31- Pete Aguilar- $2,246,265, Eloise Reyes- $1,029,617
• IL-13- Ann Callis- $1,936,927, George Gollin- $522,126
• VA-08- Don Beyer- $2,688,020, Patrick Hope- $307,599

The New Dem analysis for why they have to spend more than real Democrats never touches on the fact that the New Dems’ conservative policy agenda turns off Democratic primary voters. Instead they claim that “moderate districts are by definition competitive… In 2014, outside groups spent an average of $2.2 million per race in New Democrat and Blue Dog districts, compared with an average of $299,339 in Progressive Caucus districts. All told, outside groups spent $121 million on moderate districts, vs. $20.4 million in liberal ones.” [Keep in mind that New Dems and Blue Dogs and their propagandists like Kim, always refer to them as “moderate” rather than as the conservatives that they are.]

What a surprise.  People require a lot more money to vote for a phony Democrat as they do  to vote for a real Democrat.