One of the questions in the last election cycle was, “Why was the Seattle Times so aggressively hostile to Darcy Burner?” In her close loss to Dave Reichert.

They went so far as to misstate her degree in order to claim that she had lied about her education.

Well, now we know why they hated her, and sent their reporters out with orders to lie.

It appears that Ms. Burner ran the Committee for a Two Newspaper town, which prevented the Seattle Times from using its joint operating agreement with the Seattle Post-Intelligencer to shut the publication down, and eventually forced the Times to make $24 millions in payments to keep the JOA going.

Losing the possibility of a monopoly in Seattle advertizing was probably even more expensive to the Times than was the payment, and so when she won the Democratic Primary for congress, it was payback time.

I know, it’s an almost 2 month old analysis that I’m linking to, but I just noticed it…My bad.