Previous Material, from before April 2011, appears here. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In fact, it's an appear-a-thon -- each old non-sunsigns page leads you farther back in time... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STUFF -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- June 16, 2011: I don't want to frighten anyone who might be worried about t Pluto crossing the Ascendant. First, where's your natal Pluto, and what is it doing? Mine is in my 8th house of crisis and loss, conjunct my Sun & Mercury, sextile the lord of my Ascendant, and trine my Ascendant. My Sun is Almuten of my 4th house so, naturally, anything affecting my Sun affects my 4th house. Thus, the loss of my home (and everything else) when t Pluto crossed my Ascendant, hitting all that. I had some other awful stuff at the same time, Saturn, Uranus, Mars... My afflicted Ascendant ruler is in hostile receptions with both my Sun and afflicted Mercury, which indicates an internal struggle - and we all have internal struggles of some sort, shown by aspects and receptions, etc. I won't go into my internal struggles, here, but I'm hoping to show *why* the Pluto transit was horrible for me. If you have this transit coming up, it probably won't be as destructive for you. After all, nearly half of all people over 60 years old have had the transit. The other half had it go through the Descendant (and 8th, 9th, 10th, etc.). So, we've almost all had t Pluto cross our angles. It's no easier in the 1st house - it's worse (I *would* say that!), because the first house is the house of life. Pluto is anaretic (a death-bringer). Its affects are very individual, and also dependent on such factors as age, or season of life. In the 7th house, Pluto can bring extreme opposition or enemies. But at least they're known to you. In the first house, if there's an enemy, it has already invaded your fortress (crossed your boundaries, either with or without your invitation), like the freak stalker everyone thinks I'm imagining. (That's why I've broken ties - I am furious at so-called "friends" disbelief, and disengagement. Sadly, I'm not above hoping this exact thing happens to THEM!) But as I've said, the transit is very individual, depending on one's own unique chart. So, if you have it coming up, you might be able to see, from your chart, what form it will take, and prepare accordingly. Pluto is a wild card, and we can never fully anticipate how it will impact, but odds are it won't be as bad for you. My chart is all about death and loss so, naturally, any "bad" transit or progression or arc will be awful for me. Luckily, I can't say the same for you. Everything is relative to each unique nativity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- June 15, 2011: The Lunar eclipse... It has already done what I'd thought it would do. It will probably do more. I'm having a ton of Neptune, which isn't good. In the past, it was sometimes nice, but now I feel so drained. It's similar to when it went over my Ascendant when I was young - I could drink 3 cups of espresso (BIG ones) and still not be able to keep my eyes open. Now, it's like that, only with forgetfulness worsening, inability to concentrate well, etc. Pluto keeps moving back to antiscion my Ascendant, and I'm sick of that, too. The gates of hell opened when Pluto went over my Ascendant. I lost my home, was deeply traumatized by that, and I've been living like a housed bag lady ever since. I'm being tortured by some freak and no one cares. If they think anything, it's probably that I'm delusional. Entropy is nearing completion. I have no ties left on earth. My chart indicates that, in my current location, I won't make it to my 2nd to next birthday. I can't tell you what a relief that is to me. But I'm worried because I don't have life insurance to pay for my cremation. If I bought a cheapo life insurance policy, say $5,000., it may be worth nothing at all even in the short time ahead I'd be needing it. I worry the state won't honor my request for cremation, but will sell my corpse to a medical school! I just can't bear the thought! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- June 8, 2011: Well, the good news is the Solar Flare/Storm which will continue for another year or so. NASA says (of course) we have nothing to worry about (you really believe obama's appointees?), but there will be a shift in the electromagnetic polarity of the sun. Hmmm. A SHIFT in the POLARITY of the SUN. Gee. Wouldn't that possibly effect the orbital patterns of bodies which may rely on the electromagnetic polarity of the sun? The bad news is Jew-hating Marxists are running the USA. I like the good news better. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- May 31, 2011: I'm disappointed with the weather. I'd heard it was going to be a cooler summer, but it's been too hot and humid again, too soon, like last year. And, of course, I'm sad about all the weather related catastrophes. Astrologically, we have another Solar Eclipse tomorrow, so if you have anything at 11 degrees mutable, it will affect you, and maybe in a positive way (I still respect Charles Jayne, and he could be right that). Also, the Lunar Eclipse on the 15th will affect those of us with anything close to 25 degrees mutable in our charts. The differences in affect between a Solar eclipse and a Lunar eclipse... I think the Solar eclipse is "active", whereas the Lunar eclipse is "reactive". The Lunar eclipse may have more of an influence in bringing things to a head, since it is a culmination, and an opposition, and a full moon. It's a reflection of how others respond to the energy of whatever it hits in your chart - the way you've manifested the particular chart factor, so... I don't want to focus on the "bad" today. It's helps to hope and pray for the affects we wish for. That's what I will do. In the world at large, the eclipses and terrible clashes of Uranus (and Jupiter) and Saturn and Pluto we've been having are very rough, I imagine, on all of us. I'm saddened by the attacks in restaurants, and buses, etc., all around the country, and the rioting around the world. There's despair in the air, which is all the more reason to be compassionate, and do what we can to be our best selves. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- May 27, 2011: If you think I'm crazy for saying I think the South (if there'd been no Civil War) would have more likely fought than the North, in WWII, I guess I should explain myself. First, abolition of slavery would have ended, with or without the Civil War. If the South had become a new nation state, there would have been a lot of changes just on that account. (I'm not saying they should have been - I'm playing devil's advocate.) Part of those changes would have included abolition and, in my belief, much better relationships between blacks and whites, because there would not have been a forced, bloody imposition of Civil War. (Maybe this is crazy, but I think it's possible.) If we look at history, we see the colonies starting in the Northeast, with some very decent people, both black and white, living side by side and *not* slaughtering the Indians (that happened later, when the first and best principles got lost in greed). As time moves forward, farther and farther past the first and best principles, we begin to see more secularism spread throughout the north. As religion or faith becomes less foremost in life, humanist progressivism begins to spread. In some ways this is good; in other ways, not so much. Progressivism at its core believes that self-appointed smarter people must help think for the "other" people. The ones who may not know what's best for them. That's what we've had, in my belief, for over a century. But it's only become dangerous, if you don't like people making choices for you, in more recent years. It built very gradually, and now we've reached critical mass. People of faith (the ones who believe in tolerance for all religions, and personal choice), understand that they might not always make the right choices or decisions, but if it leads to failure, there was a lesson in it. The highest concentration of people of faith is in the south. People of faith believe, as did the Founders, that God is the source of freedom (free will to choose good over evil), and that it's an individual's responsibility to God, to live up to God's expectations. So, north and south in comparison have very different guiding principles. Based on this sketchy outline alone, which side would have searched their conscience (a concept more of faith than of secularism) as to whether they should fight for good versus evil? It's all only speculation about a silly notion. It really doesn't matter. But if this country can be saved, it will be the south that saves it (and even those northerners who still believe freedom is our birthright, and not something the government gives us.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- May 25, 2011: The world is shattering. It's happening very quickly, yet in slow motion. I remember the prayers Archie Bunker used to say on (the very Left Wing comedy) "All in the Family." To badly paraphrase, "Hiya there, God, it's me, A. Bunker, on this auspricious occasion, thanking you for the food my wife Edith cooked, even though the atheist meathead here will eat it all, but that's how it goes on this rotten world you give us. Amen." (I did say it was badly paraphraed, but the memories make me laugh.) Remember, you can make an easy donation of $10 USD to the Red Cross by texting REDCROSS to 90999. ["Easy" is a relative term - we are facing looming famine, too, which we already knew, but not on a scale like this, as so much farmland is wrecked now.] The Red Cross volunteers helped me, when the building I lived in a year ago was evacuated due to an avalanche beneath it - they got back in and brought each of us the most vital things we needed out of our apartments from lists we made. They are a good organization. I can't imagine what the people in the stricken areas of the USA are feeling, with whole towns wiped out, and all their belongings, homes, and some loved ones lost. Or the very traumatized refugees in Japan, whose country is toast. Please donate, or help, or pray, for our friends around the country, and this "rotten world". -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- May 20, 2011: I'll really have to remove all the edits in the upper part of this page which confuse the original text. Oh well. There's a polite way of saying what has to be said, here. I can't comment on any of this right now. At least, not very temperately. It does strike me as odd that such a terrible confluence of disasters should be striking nearly simultaneously worldwide. Especially when we have a little dictator in the USA's highest office, to make everything 14.5 (so far) TRILLION TIMES WORSE. So, I'm not sure who exactly is saying the world is ending tomorrow, but it would not surprise me if it did (you know, with like the Hollywood Voice of God, and ghostly horsemen, etc.). Unfortunately, it already has (only without the Hollywood Voice of God, &c), unless we can pull off a miracle (don't look at me). Japan has no free press, and they're really suffering. New Zealand had an earthquake which got little attention. Planes are crashing a lot. Oh, and our south is burning in some places, and flooding in others. There's a lot more. The only bulwark against the destruction of Western Civilization was tossed aside by a little dictator, yesterday (pay no attention, good bulwark, because the little dictator sides with ignorant criminals and murderers, like his idols, the 1960s black Chicago street gangs, which brought, via their prison time and the Arab scum already here, the murderous thing called Islam to uneducated blacks, especially in Chicago, speading hatred of Jews among ignorant blacks throughout the land for 60 years). "God" disposes of each of us according to what we've sown. (I'm no example of much good. But, thankfully, I'm no example of much bad, either.) I believe God has affection for good things, so I won't give up hope for good to prevail just yet. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- May 11, 2011: There's something I must make clear. I wish to God that Lara Logan had remained safe when she went to revolting Egypt as a reporter. I wish to God that every innocent person would be safe from evil. The thing is, evil is taking over and being heralded as "good", and we cannot be safe as long as that is true. The "godsend" I meant is, if only the Leftists would recognize that what they are applauding as "good" is, in reality, true evil, just maybe the sleeping lambs in this exploding world would wake up and realize evil is NOT WHAT WE WANT! When I was in elementary school (before I was assigned to an experimental Communist middle school, without my parents' knowledge), we were shown the animated movie version of Orwell's brilliant, anti-communist work, "Animal Farm". Today, kids in public elementary, middle schools & high schools, are being taught to prepare for a new communist revolution (heard about the Tucson school riots?). If you have kids, are you up on what they're learning in school? Do their textbooks feature contributors like (Communist & former advisor to Obama) Van Jones, as many do in NY? Are they being taught what a hero (Communist) Che Guevara was? Are they wearing Che t-shirts? Do their textbooks use catch phrases such as Social Justice and transformation which has nothing to do with Pluto - or maybe it does, as it involves death and destruction (that's what Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, and the Obamas, not to mention Obama's regulatory czars get really excited about)? Oh, that would include Obama's good pal, Bill Ayers (yes, and Hillary did her thesis on him, too!), "just an English teacher..." according to campaigning Obama. Well, see, Bill Ayers is not just an English teacher; among other things, he's a former and forever member of the Weather Underground - a Communist group from the 1960s - who stated, and never retracted, that those of us (in the USA) who could not be "Re-educated" would have to be killed. How many? "Uh, 35 million?" But that was in the 1960s. The population has grown since then. As an estimate, I'd say they'd probably want to knock off at least 150 million of us now. Because Bill Ayers is still alive and kicking up the shit, and drafting more recruits, and 'helping' the little dictator... Yesterday, the little dictator was campaigning again, saying the Border Wall "is basically all built." That's a lie. Check for yourself, because I'm not a popular read and anything I say is likely to be dismissed. (And I've said a lot of stupid stuff through the years, as my very slow thinking has undergone changes. I used to be down on Lincoln, thinkin' he had a lot o' blood on his hands. A quack shrink angrily asked, which side (South or North) would have fought Hitler? You know. now, I think it would have been the South. Yankee Liberalism just ain't what you think it is. And yes, slavery never should have been - but it started in the Colonies, when a black land-owner won a court case saying he did not have to *ever* liberate an indentured servant. YES, it is true, try some research.) Now there's a topic - real U.S. history - *none* of us were taught it in school (and-really-should-at-least-learn-now). Of course, now that I know Radical Islamists justify their hatred of the U.S. (and Israel) for not only the freedom we've had, but that the land was taken from the American Indians (that's what one of them told me) - something I also had believed was a crime - I can no longer think of it that way because, although a lot of horror was involved along the way (where on earth hasn't there been?), the USA became a sort of Noah's Arc, saving a little bit of everyone, creating a greater good (if only we could keep it), and if the corrupt Federal govt would get out of our way and let this be the true USA, more American Indian tribes would prosper, as have certain tribes which have built prosperity via business - and not just casinos and tobacco, but right in mainstream, Main Street, off-the-reservation, USA. They don't have to forget where they came from, or their pride in their own culture, any more than anyone else! I'm not against immigration. I'm against *illegal* immigration, and I'm against opening our doors to anyone who'd like to harm us. [And I think there are good people who are Muslims. They know that speaking out against Radical Islam is extremely dangerous, and I'd guess most just want to keep their families safe.] I'm pretty much against everything that was illegal in the year 1958. Except pot, because there's no good reason to prohibit it, unless you're W.R. Hearst of the old newspaper dynasty, fighting against the use of hemp for paper-making - oh, that's right - he's dead. And abortion, because I never want another woman to kill herself at the hands of some butcher, or herself, no matter the reason for the unwanted pregnancy; that's between her and her maker. There are a lot of things, come to think of it, that I'd want legal since 1958. (By the way, did you know Eisenhower (a Republican) helped birth the Civil Rights bill which JFK got the credit for? That's kinda how it's been for a coupla centuries now, including Republican Lincoln. Just file it under things that make you go "hmm.") The *only* illegal-in-1958 thing I can think of which is not only legal but encouraged *now*, and was neither of those things *then*, is TREASON (and the loss of recognition between good and evil). I've hinted before that I think I can explain a large part of why people *are* choosing evil now. I guess I'll try it when the spirit moves me. When it comes to a person's own body, it should be hir choice alone what s/he wants to do to it. When it comes to my country, and the fate of the world, I draw the line. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- May 11, 2011: Since last week's first Republican debate (which only included those who have declared themselves running for election, early), Herman Cain has fast become the darling of right wing cable news. I'm sorry to say it, but this is little more than a desperate attempt by white Republicans to prove their hatred of the little dictator is not based on race. I'm not sure to whom they're trying to prove it. The Left? The Left are such morons, they'd do anything to discredit Herman Cain - probably call *him* a racist. Are they trying to prove it to themselves? It could be. They're well off, never had to live in areas I've had to live, never had to be endangered or damaged by the savages they won't admit exist (they're as bad as the Left, in that regard). Let's get off the Herman Cain train. He's an outsider, and an unknown quantity, just as the little dictator was. The only difference is that his views 'sound' much saner - but what would happen if he were elected? He's an unknown quantity. The others have their records in office to *prove* what they are (and with the little dictator, just knowing he was "present" was enough for over half the electorate to wet their pants, last time around - now of course YOU, hopefully, finally know he's anti-American in every possible way). Interesting how the Leftist Media has reported so little on the several crazed terrorist attempts of our sweet domestic MooSlims since Obama - oops - Osama was killed. Isn't it? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- May 6, 2011: What happened to journalist Lara Logan by the mob of Egyptian savages (those "good" people, who *just want democracy*!), was horrific, but also a godsend. I say that because, if the Leftist media would open their imbecile minds to things they keep denying, maybe we could understand the dynamics which exist in our own inner cities. If you are a woman alone - completely alone - living in an area in which your color does not match the immediate majority's, you will suffer a fate of evil at the hands of one or more savages, and no one will do a thing to help you. This is the unvarnished truth. So, will the horror Lara Logan survived remain her own personal hell, or will you wise up and realize that many people - men - are nothing more than savages, and that when a woman is being abused you will actually help her, rather than turn away? I know when the USA began to die. I don't know if you're ready to hear it. As for candidates, I saw the first debate of conservative hopefuls last night. The only one I think I can fully believe in is Gary Johnson. He isn't a complete purist, like Ron Paul, whom I respect but can't completely agree with; Gary Johnson, I believe, is someone who realizes we can't entirely abandon foreign policy. I may be wrong. His stated policies from last night's debate are sound, he is sane, and he is probably humane. He is not a troglodyte who would deny abortion to victims of rape and incest like the rest of them (although he does believe in privatizing abortion, which is fine with me, and stipulating that the fetus must not be "viable", which is okay with me). He's smart - legalize pot, regulate it, sell it, and TAX it! Decriminalize use of other drugs. Extremely sensible. And he understands what must be done regarding the major issues, such as free market business growth and chopping down Federal govt. I find all of this far more appealing than the policies of the rest of the trogs on that stage. If any of the absent rhinos, like Gingrich, Huckaby, or Romney, win the primary election, we're sunk. It'll be a free pass to another four years of Obama, and the complete ruin and collapse of what's left of the USA. It's well worth our while to spread the word that Gary Johnson is the best of the bunch. (Bachmann would never do anything as sensible as legalize, regulate, and tax and sell marijuana, which is a much more benign substance than alcohol.) (I was disappointed to see that Michele Bachmann wasn't there, but I have almost zero hope that a woman can be elected in this great country of ours, full of savages that look like men.) Maybe one day, the human race will cease to be herd animals who are drawn to strong looks, voice, and clever quips (quick Mercury - and it often does not catch or process all the info it needs, in its hurry to appear smart). If that day ever came, maybe those who truly value freedom and responsibility will get the government they deserve. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 29th, 2011: The UK Royal Wedding was very beautiful. Perfect. I loved the music; the chorus were brilliant, and the fanfare and marching band (the chubby fellow leading them was BORN to play that role!), and it was charming that they played some lovely and spirited traditional folk tunes before the Abbey filled up. I watched because it seemed better than the miserable alternative of trying to sleep. (Which is exactly the thing the stalker freak does - prevents sleep; it's been rougher, again, lately, as the stalker waxes and wanes in aggression). As I watched, it was impossible not to compare it with Diana's wedding, 30 years ago. I saw that one more by chance, because I'd only recently moved to New York, and I was working late hours, so I was awake... Princess Diana's wedding was so sad. She seemed so unhappy - and terrified. (That might have been mostly my own projection.) She still did well, under the scrutiny, although she messed up the many names of Charles (so what - he messed up the kiss), and I heard in today's wee hours that, in contrast to Catherine being with family and friends, the night before Diana's wedding she was alone in a room, being served her supper on a tray (and even already knew about Camilla!). I wonder that the queen didn't have her locked in the Tower to be certain of her chastity! But this wedding was happy, and full of the pageantry we on-lookers wanted. Even if you're an American Constitutionalist, if you're female and older than 45, most likely you read all those fairy tales about the travails of the unhappy girl who persists in goodness and is found by a relatively handsome prince and lives happily ever after. It's very early indoctrination, and it'll always be part of your psyche (which is why elementary kids in our public schools are being taught how to be Socialists). It even has a wicked stepmother (your choice of whom)! And although everything was much cleaner, it looked medieval in many ways - Catherine herself, the Abbey, the costumery of various uniforms, fanfares, the choral music... thankfully not the Black Plague, yet. I pondered the happy couple, and was perplexed by the choice of this particular day, and if there'd been an astrologer who helped choose it. The Moon would be too near Scheat, for my liking, etc., etc. etc. But maybe it played well into their synastry. What I realized is that I was a mite more somewhat right about William's unconscious cruelty toward Catherine. He made her wait 7 or 8 years, presuming they became steadies by the end of their 2nd year as an item, and then broke up with her to test her reliability, as one commentator put it. So... she's a Swiss watch? Well, he waited until her biological clock was at 22:00 hours (GMT) to finally tie the knot! She looks like a Taurus (I haven't seen a chart for her) so I get her patience, but I also know she'd want to 'do proper-like' by the old queen and produce a fat great-grandchild or three before the spritely Elizabeth wends her way to heaven. By the way, weren't the prayers great, too? The whole thing was great. Even Elizabeth looked happy. [There was a very funny moment regarding something to do with Camilla, but I can't think of a clever way to put it.] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 27, 2011: Someone who contacted me via my site has flown off the handle and suggested I'm a flat-earther because I finally decided it's time a little constructive criticism could go a long way. My position is: To study astrology (or anything), it's important to start at the beginning and work your way forward. With serious study. But this person is so offended by the notion, I'm accused of not respecting independent thought (no, not when it's foolish), and doing things one way, ever so stodgily and unoriginally, because 'some dead guy' said so. Or something. Well, I respect independent thought when there is solid knowledge behind it. I don't typically reach out to people (except regarding my stalking situation) much anymore. If someone appreciates what I write, fine. If you don't, you don't, and hopefully find something you do appreciate, elsewhere. If someone writes to me, I may or may not write back, depending on the content of the message. I'm beginning to think it's a mistake to reply to anyone. This all arose because of the non-story of Obama releasing his "birth certificate", prompting comments on transits at the time of his election and inauguration. My position is that transits are *not* enough. You have to start with assessing the natal. Then, it's progressions, directions, etc., which show *major* life events. Sure, transits figure in, but they're *not strong enough*. After I looked at the chart, my first thought was that this is NOT his real chart. I should probably tell you why. If it is his real chart, he is a man without an identity, without heart, without courage, and I'd expect the owner of the chart to be working a blue collar job. The Sun is extremely weak, poorly housed in the 6th, and pitted (see, it doesn't *matter* that it's in Leo, except that maybe he's got an ego without anything to back it up). The Ascendant is either lame or pitted (I'm speaking from memory), and contains the Dragon's Tail. There's nothing in the 10th, and his MC ruler, Mars, is verging on the 8th, whilst his Asc ruler, Saturn, is trembling in the 12th, one of them either lame or pitted. They do trine, and with a mixed reception - granted Mars receives Saturn into exaltation, but they're both malefics, in bad houses. Saturn in the 12th as Asc ruler does indicate secretiveness, and duplicity (especially with a 4th house Gemini Moon, it's second nature) - in fact, another profile the chart suggests is that of a lower level mob flunkie (I can make a case that the 8th house is the house of theft, especially when joined with a 12th house Saturn, as well as fearing for one's life, as mobsters frequently do - at least in the movies). If this is his true chart, I am sorry for him. He is a frightened man, who has had so much sorrow. It's almost impossible to hate him, seeing this aspect of his soul (we never see all of it, but we see some). He has skated on his likeability - Venus is his strongest planet, making him *seem* easygoing and good. But he is very brittle, and very vain, and wounded by the slightest of slights. But he has a dogged self-discipline/endurance, I think, due to that Mars-Saturn trine, and a lot of fixity - so he does not want to leave office in 2013 (he'll probably have to be pried away with whatever unseals CrazyGlue). Is this is his true chart, we could see "collective salvation" in the Aquarius Asc, the individual inner emptiness of him, and the emphasis on the western hemisphere of his chart - including 8th house issues: your money which he loves to throw around, and take ever more of (I really do have to write my 8th house article, God help me). These are only the headlines (if I wanted to waste time, I could write so much more, and still be completely wrong, according to my critic). See, not a word about The Fed... and their historic interview which no one is talking about. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 26, 2011: I was interested to see an interview with Ron Paul last night. In principle, he'd be great for the country, but I was dismayed by what I feel are problematic blind spots in his views. 1) He indicated that we brought 9/11 on ourselves due to our foreign policy - namely that we had some troops in Saudi Arabia, which angered Islamists (but *everything* angers Islamists); 2) He is oblivious to the Islamist problems we have domestically - I guess he's never lived anyplace where women walk around in black tents from head to toe, with netting even over the eye-slit. That sort of brings the picture of the future here a little more into perspective. There are so many horrible things happening everyday, it truly feels like Armageddon is upon us. The astrological picture is only going to intensify, and conditions will continue to worsen. I believe Trump is working for Obama, though I cannot imagine why. He is blowing smoke, which obscures the disasters this DICTATOR is wreaking upon our nation DAILY. Have you seen the new passport application? And why would we be in Libya under the pretext of "Responsibility to Protect" or whatever sweet little cutthroat Samantha Powers calls it, when wholesale slaughter is happening on our own borders??? And HR5 - if Congress votes YES, you could not sue your doctor if he cut your legs off during what was supposed to be a tonsillectomy! ARE YOU GOING TO JUST SMILE AND BEND OVER FOR ALL THIS? Our freedoms are being erased EVERY DAY! They're SAYING "TO HELL WITH THE CONSTITUTION, JUST USE YOUR EXECUTIVE POWERS", AND HE IS! BARACK OBAMA IS A DICTATOR! HE IS A DICTATOR! HE HAS COMMITTED TREASON! HE IS A DICTATOR, and there isn't a damn thing anyone can do about it, because they're too Politically Correct. And the Supreme Court Justices went merrily off on their 3 month vacation before voting on the health care repeal, which means it won't be DECIDED UNTIL BILLIONS OF DOLLARS MORE HAVE BEEN SPENT ACCORDING TO THAT 2000+ PAGE BILL! Is THIS YOUR AMERICA? It sure as HELL is not mine. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 20, 2011: To clarify, I think *far* more highly of Sarah Palin than anyone else in the current political arena, but it took me awhile to actually listen to her and find out that she is consistent, and extremely strong, and her positions are sound. That's the problem - too many people know nothing about her, but decry her as whatever negative thing that NBC or ABC has portrayed her to be that day. There are other drawbacks which have more to do with superficialities, because you can't get elected nowadays unless you have a suitable "Ascendant" in every way - looks, sound, etc. In many ways we were better off before TV, when it comes to politics. There's still one thread for exclusion when it comes to a candidate WE should back - whoever's campaign George Soros is NOT funding - and he has so many cover groups and organizations, it will probably take a little doing to track the money back to him. He's not holing up in a New Hampshire mansion, now, like an evil spider, for nothing. He wants Obama, or maybe someone newer, with a more winnable face, keeping control, collapsing the dollar forever, so he can have his world without boundaries, within which we are little cogs in a BIG, benevolent-as-Stalin, MACHINE. Don't forget that Bill Ayers, his pal & Obama's, still thinks about 35 million Americans would need to be killed if we couldn't be "RE-EDUCATED." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 19, 2011: You might want to review my "forecasts" page - I think I said it would be dangerous around this date. (For that matter, *I* might want to review my "forecasts" page.) So, it alll becomes verrry clear... George Soros, the old bastard who should be dead (he "liked helping the Nazis" confiscate his Jewish neighbors' possessions, himself a Jew), and who enjoys collapsing ecomomies, funded McCain in '08 - guaranteeing Obama's election, because people who know what a flounder McCain is would never vote for him, especially with so much collective passion for getting rid of Bush. I have some insights into why there is so much participation by self-hating, atheistic American Jews on the Lunatic Left, and I've been hoping to explain (and I will), but the point is, the freak is colluding with these commie scum, and Soros would love to see them win. So far, they are. I was liking Donald Trump's viewpoints, but then I saw his history of campaign contributions to lots and lotsa real Dims, and it gave me pause. What if he is, as someone on Twitter put it, "a trojan horse for Obama", leading to a split vote should he run as an Independent, and slipping the freak another 4 year pass? For that reason alone, I think Trump should STOP NOW, and go hide out in one of his hotels for the next couple of years. We need a strong candidate who is not slick, nor corrupted, but serious and effective about restoring our Republic. Someone who can show up exactly what the freak has been doing, and counter that with solutions that the electorate can plainly understand. If we were a more evolved nation <hysterical laughter and tears>, I'd nominate Michele Bachman. But, we all know a woman still cannot get elected. A black commie, yes. A sensible American woman, no. This time around, let's look into who George Soros is funding to oppose the freak. That seems to be the gold standard for knowing who will fail to prevail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 15, 2011: I'll bet all the 8th housers are having a nice day... (sarcasm). You know, at least in the '70s we had "generic" food - long areas in supermarkets with foods in plain white boxes, labeled with black print, which cost much less than branded foods. The imposter's new Socialist era won't even let us have that. How much did you spend on gas this week? How much did a loaf of bread increase in the past month? Damn, that imposter is good! WHAT would it take before SOMEONE *seriously* decided to impeach the freak? Biden would sleep through it, and Hillary would be cowed into bending in the right direction. Then we could get rid of the whole treasonous lot of them. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 15, 2011: And what it wasn't then (1998, I think) appropriate to write about Prince William's yod, and still might be, is that the death of his mother would leave him deeply distrustful of women due to abandonment trauma, and likely to behave cruelly towards women he becomes involved with. This is already shown by his decision to give his fiancee his mother's ring, which symbolized a marriage in which she was betrayed, and made miserable. If you were going to marry Prince William, would *you* want the baggage attached to that ring? I certainly would not, so Ms. Middleton must truly be in love, because she's blinded to a giant red flag. I don't say William has any intention of ever hurting his wife-to-be - it's only that he will, and already has, even if it's only ever subconscious. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 5, 2011: Paul Ryan did a beautiful thing, and I'm very glad. Please don't listen to the rhetoric of the "Democrats". Nancy Pelosi starts screaming about the "Republicans" starving senior citizens. Here's the fact: Since Obama got in office, there has not been a yearly increase in Social Security checks. That's NO cost-of-living increase in THREE YEARS, while food prices, energy prices, and clothing prices, just to name a few, are rising dramatically in cost. Obama and Pelosi HAVE BEEN STARVING SENIOR CITIZENS, moreover, the Obama health care bill lowered Medicare pay-outs, so that many health care options for people who only have Medicare are GONE. You only have your "choice of doctor" in theory, because many doctors now refuse to accept Medicare. And the ones who do, are lying to their patients regarding how frequently they will need various tests done, etc. Because since Obama & Pelosi, MEDICARE NO LONGER PAYS OUT SUFFICIENTLY FOR HEALTH CARE. Under Obama & Pelosi, the people who only have Social Security and Medicare HAVE BEEN STARVING, and CAN NO LONGER GET QUALITY HEALTH CARE. At this point, there is more than enough reason to impeach Obama. He's arming Al-Quaeda "rebels" in Libya, which is just the most visible of his many acts of treason. But we don't care about that, because, gee, he's our first half-black president, it would look just terrible... (And after all, the 2008 electorate (and past and present media) have proven that style rules, and substance drools.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 3, 2011: What I neglected to mention about the malevolence of today is that, with the Moon combust (as it always is at a New Moon), the malevolence is initially hidden. For example, under cover of literal and figurative darkness, thieves get away with theft, fugitives remain on the loose, criminals get away with crimes, and other bad things escape notice, such as any kind of temporarily hidden structural damage. Electrical or explosive things tie in, due to the parallel of Mars and Uranus. So, it is often only a while later that the bad things "come to light". Unfortunately, I also neglected to notice (because my brain is a marshmallow, now) that the malefic opposition of the New Moon opposing Saturn, in terrible mutual reception, at Cardinal degrees square the January eclipse, pulls in bad factors within my own chart, which may have germinated today, only to be manifested when t Saturn again hits the same degree in direct motion. So, I must try to be as careful as I possibly can, but I've already had lapses of temper today which may cost me dearly down the horrible road of my life. [And if we all never committed any of the "Seven Deadly Sins" we'd be perfect, and none of us are perfect.] So, that's also a note - due to the hidden nature of the New Moon, things germinate today which will manifest when t Saturn hits today's degree by direct motion on or about August 19th, when it just so happens that Mars will hit the degree of July's Solar Eclipse. So, watch for August 19th to tie back in a malefic way to today, April 3rd. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 2, 2011: Well, April 3 will suck-a-lot, which I mentioned in my Forecasts page (linked at top). It's already April 3 in much of the world. But if you look at my Forecasts page, please read the entry before the April 3 forecast, because it contains more regarding April dates. How NOT nice it was to enroll in an AARP insurance plan. Suddenly, the only (non-addictive) pain killer which actually gives me some help is no longer "covered". I have a feeling nothing is covered unless it's gone generic, which is an EXCELLENT argument for allowing big pharma to keep their filthy psychotropic drugs BRANDED, and unavailable generically, forever. I received the "medical" records pertaining to last year's psychiatric arrest, and reading them shook me terribly, and renewed the horror of the violation. Among other blatant lies, it stated I'd been hospitalized for mental illness frequently throughout my life - I NEVER WAS, BEFORE LAST YEAR'S HORROR. The entire thing is a sickening crock of shit, meant to cover their asses, justify locking me up, and discrediting me legally, because it's my word against theirs regarding what they did or did not tell me, etc. I was upset for days after reading it. And now I'll work to find a way to channel my outrage constructively. On a search to find the states which are least likely to lock you up because your hair is unwashed and your apartment isn't unpacked, and the police are total morons, I came across this great web site, which will explain to you why psychiatry (modern mainstream) is a crock of shit. It sickened, but empowered me, to find so many others have gone through what I did, and that one day the horror of being dragged from your residence for no justifiable reason will be long gone. But we have to make it so. Bottom line - it is my belief that county and municipal hospitals freely abuse their power, to lock up ordinary people in psych wards, to collect the insurance - I believe they use this device as a source of revenue to keep the rest of the hospital financially solvent. It's a disgraceful scam. I can't count the number of women (hugely outnumbering men) who fell into their trap - a revolving door of them. Some *were* suffering from depression, or said they were - others just had this DONE TO THEM. Please see my Victims' page, linked on a prior Sunsigns page, for more details. This follows me everywhere - if I want to buy or lease a car, the bank can get this horrible set of lies about me! This sort of thing never happened @ 30-plus years ago. There were nutty people in apartment buildings and SRO's who loudly ranted and raved (which wasn't what I was doing when I called the police for help with the bastard stalker), but they were never hauled off to psychiatric lock-up. The world has changed in so many disgusting ways. If Glenn Beck, or Michael Savage, were not lucky (because they *are*), they'd be locked up as "paranoid schizophrenics" who believe in, and propagate, "conspiracy theories". I hope they understand how lucky they are, and I hope they join efforts to stop conventional, highly destructive psychiatry, and its henchmen - the police, and imbeciles with medical degrees who diagnose "illnesses" which cannot be quantified in any real way. The whole thing is a scam. Meanwhile, if you are an *older* woman (because this happens far more to women than to men) on your own (because the way the police treated me when I was young and attractive is vastly different from the way they've treated me since I've aged), who could be considered vulnerable, and someone is intentionally bothering you without leaving obvious physical evidence, or even if there is evidence, but no independent witnesses who have the decency to speak up for you, *don't call the police*. If you have any means, hire someone to work for you to stop the scumbag. If you have no money, sell stuff. If you can't sell anything, try to become close to someone decent in your house of worship who would possibly help you. If you don't belong to a house of worship, join one. The point is, you can probably think of a way to achieve your objective without any initial contact with the police. Later, as you gather evidence, etc., you can go with witnesses - protected, because there's safety in numbers - to police to press charges, if that's what you need to do, against your abuser. I met another older woman, not at the lock-up, who said she called the police because an intruder broke into her house and had awakened her. The first thing the police asked her was whether she was drunk! She'd been woken up, and probably sounded panicked and confused from sleep. The police do NOT "serve and protect" older women (unless you have been physically beaten up, I guess...). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wish you peace, good fortune, and, of course, good health.
Gail
|
||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| . |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
|
|
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| |
||
| All Rights Reserved; Gail Sandra Klein | ||